Secret Rapture Header

    The greatest event in Bible prophecy is the Second Coming of Jesus Christ as King of Kings and Lord of Lords. The importance of a correct understanding of this event cannot be over-emphasized. The reason I say this is because, if there is to be one particular point upon which Satan would hope to deceive us, this is the one. If he can intercept this teaching, then he can be assured that many, who profess to be followers of Christ, will not be prepared for Christ's Second Coming. If Christ's followers are not biblically schooled and are listening only to those who “claim” to have/know the truth, it is as though they are building their doctrine on shifting sand, instead of the Rock.

    Paul, the Apostle, warned in Acts 20:29 & 30,
    “For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. 30 Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.”
    One cannot know by a leader's demeanor, Chrisma, preaching ability or how much they can excite the human spirit, whether they are speaking truth or error. This is true of all doctrine, theology and eschatology. Again, if Christ's followers are listening only to those who claim to have the truth regarding this matter, they, even if they are the elect, will be deceived. Christ, Himself, told us that there would be deception in the world regarding His Second Coming, when He said,
    “For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. 22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. 23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. 24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. 25 Behold, I have told you before. 26 Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. 27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” Matthew 24:21-27
    Please notice that “the elect” are mentioned twice in this passage. In the first mention, Christ encourages the elect of their deliverence, but only after great tribulation. The preachers/teachers of the Rapture Theory, teach that the elect will be “caught up” before tribulation begins. This cannot be true, because it contradicts Christ own words, in the passage above. They also teach that there will be a 1,000 year reign of Christ, on Earth. In the second mention, those same elect are warned of deception regarding His Second Coming. Not only will there be false prophets, but also false christ's. It is not possible to tell, from this scripture, alone, whether both false christ's and false prophets will “show great signs and wonders”, but it is pretty clear that they will both be working works of deception. I am reminded of a heading on the infamous “Enquirer”, declaring, “Christ is Alive, Today, Living in Idaho!” I believe that things of this sort are planted by Satan to mock God and belittle Christianity. Why do I say this? — How can I make this claim? Well... Let's consider:

    The Enquirer was known for (and has admitted) making up stories, then, building and nurturing them and adding to them, until they reached the point of absurdity. To state it simply: much of what they “reported” were lies — and who is the father of lies? Satan. One might say hat I'm stretching it a bit, but a lie is a lie. In addition, when the Enquirer wasn't lying, it was glorifying sex, glamour and celebrity scandals, all of which, are reports of Sin and, therefore, Satanic. The Enquirer has now closed its doors and been replaced by others of the same ilk. They, too, represent the same sinful worldliness of mankind. While they exercise their right of freedom of speech, Christians must exercise their freedom of sight, letting no wicked thing pass before their eyes. (See Psalms 101:3.)

    Almost all Christians are interested in prophecy. This is especially so if the prophecies show what will happen to Christians themselves. There is nothing wrong in desiring such personal knowledge. Even our Lord gave a considerable amount of teaching about the circumstances to befall His people at the end of the age (Matthew 24:22-25). All of us share a common concern in wanting to know about the participants, the chronology, and the geography of those prophecies. To comprehend the full knowledge of them it is obvious that all relevant statements of our Lord and His apostles must be properly interpreted and placed into a coherent order. Many Christians have attempted to do this. As a consequence, the doctrine of the Rapture has arisen. So important has it become to many that the teaching is now sanctioned as the prime revelation from God to show what will happen Lo members of His church just before and during the second coming of Christ. Some even look on it as the heart and core of present Christian expectations! Because of this, it will pay us to review what the doctrine is all about.

    The word "Rapture" is not found in the Bible. There is also no single word used by the biblical authors to describe the prophetic factors which comprise the doctrine. Its formulation has come about by means of induction. Certain biblical passages concerning the second coming (and the role that Christians will play in that event) have been inductively blended together to establish the teaching. The modern expression "Rapture" was then invented to explain the overall teaching and the term suits the subject well. The basic tenets of the doctrine are uninvolved. Simply put, it purports that Christ will come back to this earth in two phases. He will first return invisibly to rapture His church away from this world so that they might escape (or partially escape the prophetical tribulation to occur near the end of the age, then later Christ will return in a visible advent to dispense His wrath on the world's nations. This is the general teaching.

    Many details concerning these prime factors, however, are hotly debated. There is especially much argument over the chronological features associated with it. Some think the time lapse between the two phases will be 3 1/2 years, others say 7 years. Some feel that the Rapture of the church occurs before the Tribulation, others about mid-way through, Many suggest that the church will be taken to heaven for protection, but a few have proposed a geographical area on this earth. There are those who feel that only part of the church will escape, while others say all will he rescued, These variations, along with others, have multiplied the interpretations to such an extent that many diverse secondary opinions exist among those holding the belief. But all are unanimous on one point: the central theme of the Rapture shows that Christ will return to earth in two phases.

    The Newness of the Doctrine

    It may come as a surprise to many Christians, but the doctrine of the Rapture is not mentioned in any Christian writings, of which we have knowledge, until after the year 1830 A.D. Whether the early writers were Greek or Latin, Armenian or Coptic, Syrian or Ethiopian, English or German, orthodox or heretic, no one mentioned a syllable about it. Of course, those who feel the origin of the teaching is in the Bible would say that it only ceased being taught (for some unknown reason) at the close of the apostolic age only to reappear in 1830 A.D. But if the doctrine were so clearly stated in Scripture, it seems incredible that no one should have referred to it before the 19th century. This does not necessarily show that the teaching is wrong, but it does mean that thousands of eminent scholars who lived over a span of seventeen centuries (including some of the most astute of the "Christian Fathers" and those of the Reformation and post-Reformation periods) must be considered as prophetic dunces for not having understood so fundamental a teaching. We are not denigrating the doctrine in mentioning these historical facts. That is not our intention. But we do feel that the Foundation should show the historical problems associated with the teaching. This lapse of seventeen centuries when no one mentioned anything about it must be a serious obstacle to its reliability.

    Its Beginning

    The result of a careful investigation into the origin of the Rapture has been recently published. The book is an excellent one which deserves to be read by all people interested in the subject. Its title: "The Unbelievable Pre-Trib Origin" by Dave MacPherson. He catalogs a great deal of historical material which answers the doctrine's mysterious derivation. We wish to review the results of his research. In the middle 1820's a religious environment began to be established among a few Christians in London. England which proved to be the catalyst around which the doctrine of the Rapture emerged. Expectations of the soon coming of our Lord were being voiced, This was no new thing, but what, was unusual was the teaching by a Presbyterian minister named Edward Irving that there had to be a restoration of the spiritual gifts mentioned in I Corinthians 12-14 just before Christ's second coming. To Irving, the time had come for those spiritual manifestations to occur. Among the expected gifts was the renewal of speaking in tongues and of spirit-motivated prophetic utterances. Irving began to propagate his beliefs. His oratorical skills and enthusiasm caused his congregation in London to grow. Then a number of people began to experience the "gifts." Once this happened opposition from the organized churches set in. It resulted in Irving's dismissal from the Presbyterian church in 1832. His group then established themselves as the Catholic Apostolic Church and continued the teachings of Irving.

    These events were the beginnings of what some call present day Pentecostalism. Indeed Irving has been called by some church historians "the father of modern Pentecostalism." What does all this have to do with the origin of the Rapture doctrine? Very much indeed. Let us look at what happened in the year 1830 -- two years before Irving's dismissal from the Presbyterian church. In that year a revival of the "gifts" began to be manifested among a few people living in the lowlands of Scotland. They experienced what they called the outpouring of the Spirit. It was accompanied with speaking in "tongues" and other charismatic phenomena. Irving had been preaching these things must occur, and now they were.

    On one particular evening. the power of the Holy Spirit was said to have rested on a Miss Margaret .Macdonald while she was in a state of illness at home. She was dangerously sick and thought she was dying. In spite of this (or perhaps because she is supposed to have come under "power" of the spirit for several successive hours during which she experienced the manifestations of "mingled prophecy and vision." The message she received during this prophetic vision convinced her that Christ was going to appear in two stages at His second coming -- and not one! The emanation revealed that Christ would first come in glory to them that look for Him and again in a final stage when every eye would see Him. It was this visionary experience of Miss Macdonald which represents the prime source of the modern Rapture doctrine as the historical evidence compiled by Mr. MacPherson abundantly shows.

    The Influence of John Darby

    Many people have thought that John Darby, the founder of the Plymouth Brethren, was the originator of the Rapture doctrine. This is not the case. Darby was a brilliant theologian with outstanding scholarly abilities. Even those who have disagreed with his teachings admit that he, and many associated with him, helped to cause a revival in biblical learning throughout the evangelical world (which even has been perpetuated down to our own present day). All who love biblical research ought to be thankful for what Darby and especially his associates accomplished for biblical scholarship. They particularly helped pave the way for the renewal of modern lexical studies of the languages of the Bible. The doctrine of "dispensationalism" was also a teaching they brought to the attention of the Protestant world.

    It had long been thought by many Christians that the Rapture doctrine originated with ,John Darby. It is now known that this is not true. Darby only popularized it. Scofield and others who took over Darby's mantle later helped to make it respectable, Today, many of those in the evangelical sphere of Christianity are so certain of its veracity that it is accepted as the absolute truth of God. The fact is, however, John Darby received the knowledge of the doctrine from someone else. The source was the Margaret Macdonald mentioned above.

    The studies of Mr. MacPherson show that her sickness during which she received her visions and revelations occurred sometime between February 1 and April 14, 1830. And by late spring and early summer of 1830, her belief in the two phases of Christ's coming was being mentioned in praise and prayer meetings in several towns of western Scotland. In these meetings some people were speaking in "tongues" and other charismatic occurrences were in evidence. These extraordinary and strange events in western Scotland so attracted John Darby that he made a trip to the area to witness himself what was going on. Though he did not approve of the ecstatic episodes that he witnessed. it is nonetheless significant that Darby, after returning from Scotland, began to teach that Christ's second coming would occur in two phases. MacPherson shows good evidence that Darby had even visited Miss Macdonald in her home. There can hardly he any doubt that the visions of Miss Macdonald are the source of the modern doctrine.

    Visions and Dreams

    While it is possible that visionary revelations can come from God, it is always prudent to be cautious in such matters. Near the same time that Miss Macdonald was receiving her visions, Joseph Smith in America was experiencing his apparitions which brought Mormon doctrines to the world. John Wilson also had his dreams which were the spark that started the false teaching of British realism. Not long afterwards Ellen G. White received her visions that resulted in many Seventh Day Adventist teachings. And remarkably, all these individuals received revelations of doctrines which were much at variance with one another. Such incidents bring to mind the warning that God gave to Moses.
“If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or wonder, and the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spoke unto thee, saying, let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the Lord proveth you, to know whether ye love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul.” Deuteronomy 13: 1-3
    The teachings of visionaries also recall to mind what the apostle John tells Christians.
“Beloved, believe not every spirit. but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.” IJohn 4:1
    And though some point to the prophecy of Daniel that "knowledge shall be increased" (Daniel 12:4) a proof that the revival of doctrinal truths will occur at the end of the age, this is not what Daniel meant. If one reads the prophet carefully. he will find that Daniel is speaking about the knowledge of his prophecies which will be increased. not the revival of general doctrines. In the original text of Daniel the definite article occurs before the word "knowledge." Daniel actually said "THE knowledge will be increased" and the text shows he means "the knowledge of his prophecies." Daniel is in no way speaking about renewing of doctrines at the time of the end. A further admonition is necessary concerning the origins of teachings which might happen near our own time. It is by the apostle Paul.
“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils.” 1Timothy 4:1
    These warnings from God's word are given as a reminder that we ought to exercise caution in accepting the truthfulness of visionary revelations especially those that happen near the end of the age and are contradictory to themselves or the Bible.

Ernest L. Martin

Ernest L. Martin's Conclusion:

    While there are many suspicious factors conferred with the origin of the Rapture, it could be admitted that the doctrine may reflect a teaching found in the Bible. At least, many feel so. John Darby no doubt thought there was something to it because after his trip to Scotland he changed his mind from believing in a single stage coming and adopted the two stage doctrine which became known as the Rapture. Darby was certainly not a visionary and his teachings whether right or wrong) are almost always based on scriptural revelation. It was Darby who popularized the Rapture with the scriptural arguments which seem so convincing to some. It could be that the teaching is basically true, but we at the Foundation for Biblical Research in Pasadena have felt incumbent to show our readers the unbiblical source of the doctrine. Too many people have for gotten that it was Miss Macdonald's visions which introduced the doctrine to the world.


    Eschatology is the study or end-time events on Planet Earth. The phrase, end-times, is also referred to in Scripture as the last days, last times, end of days, end of the world or age and others. To gain a correct understanding regarding the prophecies of the last days, we need to understad that they were given by God to prepare His people for “that” which is to come.  
Return to Document

    A Few Added Thoughts on the Secret Rapture

    While the above article well outlines the facts regarding the origin of the Raapture Theory, it only briefly mentions some of the beliefs that are held by those who have adopted and teach the premillennium/pretribulation Rapture Theory. I propose that there is a reason why these beliefs are only mentioned in brief. It would take years of research to fully outline the beliefs regarding this teaching, because every denomination (and there are over 2400 in America, alone) has its own interpretation of how, when and for exactly whom it is intended to occur. I would like to point out four observations that I have made in my 30 years of study.
  1. Most Christians who beieve in the Secret Rapture Theory cannot show, from Scripture, the basis for their belief(s). They usually rely on their pastors, ministers to tell them what the truth is regarding this doctrine. They may be able to point out a text or two from the Bible, but when it comes to actually “proving” their perspective, they seem to become confused, actually confusing themselves and are finally forced to admit, “It's just what I believe,“ “I'm just not that good at finding stuff in the Bible,” or "Well, that's what I've been taught, so that's what I believe.” This leads directly to my second point.

  2. The Secret Rapture Theory is not supported by Scripture, Many of the texts and/or passages that are used to support the belief, actually, state the opposite, but that is because they have allowed someone else to interpret Scripture for them, which is one of most dangerous things a person can do.

  3. If a person is taught that they will be “caught up&# before the final tribulation begins, known in Scripture as the “Time of Trouble,” then there will seem to be no need to prepared for it. The Time of Trouble (See Daniel 12:1-3) is time during which all Christians' faith will be tested, and if this time is made to be of no importance, Satan will harvest a great number of souls, simply because they are not prepared to withstand his deceptions. The Secret Rapture is one of those deceptions. Beware!!

    God is not only preparing a place for His people, He is also preparing a people to inhabit the place He is preparing. Only Satan would propose or suggest that there is no preparation necessary. A cursory glance at only a few texts of Scripture will quickly dispell this error. Here is only one:
        “Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. 22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. 23 For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: 24 For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was. 25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.” James 1:21-25
  4. If the Secret Rapture Theory is expounded, it destroys the truth about the Second Coming of Christ and leads to total confusion. It can only be held if Scripture is split and reassembled in such a manner to support the claim. This is NEVER GOOD!! To hold this doctrine it is necessary to split God's Timeline found in the Book of Daniel, extracting a 7-year period from it, and placing it at the end of time, thereby removing the focus from the sacrifice of Jesus “in the midst of the week,” and focusing, instead, upon an earthly reign of the antichrist. Not a very good change of focus. In addition, belief in the Secret Rapture Theory repositions the thousand-year reign of Christ, spoken of in the 20th Chapter of the Book of Revelation. There it is taught that those who are redeemed will “live and reign with Him for a thousand years.” in Heaven. This beautiful truth is eliminated, if one adopts and accepts the Secret Rapture teaching. The Rapture Theory, teaches a one-thousnad year reign of Satan. Again, int a very good change of focus.

  5. We must consider the source of a doctrine. This Doctrine did not come from Scripture, but rather from a vision of a woman who has not been tested according to Scripture regarding whether she is Spiritually qualified, verified, nor determined to be a prophet of God, able to establish doctrine. The fact that her teachings do not line up with Scripture, cannot be proven from Scripture, and in effect destroy other well-established Biblical teachings, give cause to, at least, hold her teachings under suspicion.

  6.     May God bless you, as you continue to seek His will and Truth.

LeftReturn to Home Page